Supreme Court raps Manipur govt over delay in FIR in Manipur viral video case

The court asked the centre how many, out of around 6,000 FIRs, are for crimes against women

Manipur violence case: SC to hear case next on Aug 7, asks DGP to be present

The Supreme Court today pulled up the Centre and Manipur governments on the horrific viral video incident in the state where two women were paraded naked on May 4.

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said that one cannot justify what happened in Manipur “by saying that this and this happened elsewhere”.

In response to a lawyer who spoke about crimes against women in Bengal, Rajasthan, and Chhattisgarh, the Chief Justice said that one cannot excuse what’s happening in Manipur on the ground that similar crimes are happening in other parts of the state.

CJI Chandrachud asked ” Question is how do we deal with Manipur. Mention that…Are you saying protect all daughters of India or don’t protect anyone?” 

The top court was hearing the centre’s request to transfer the case of two women being paraded naked in strife-torn Manipur to a different state.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, who is representing the victims, stated that the government doesn’t have the data to tell how many such cases have been registered, and this shows the state of affairs. Sibal noted that, despite his appeal for a Supreme Court-monitored investigation, the victims do not want a CBI probe or a transfer of the case to Assam.

The government, meanwhile, said it has no objection if the Supreme Court monitors the investigation in the case.

The court also asked the centre how many, out of around 6,000 FIRs, are for crimes against women. The Centre said it doesn’t have a breakdown of such cases for now.

In response, the Supreme Court said, “This is not just one case like Nirbhaya. That is one isolated incident. Here it’s systemic violence perpetrated.”

Senior advocate Sibal also alleged that police were collaborating with the culprits who perpetrated the violence, saying that the women had requested protection from the police but that the officers had instead taken them into the crowd.

Sibal pointed out that while the incident took place on May 4, the Zero FIR was registered on May 18 and Transferred to the concerned police station only in June. The Supreme Court also pulled up the center, asking what they were doing for 14 days.

The Supreme Court also pulled up the center, asking what they were doing for 14 days.

However, according to Solicitor General Tushar, the Center never requested that the matter be transferred to Assam.

Mehta added that the Center had requested transfer to whichever location the court deemed appropriate.

Meanwhile, Senior advocate Indira Jaising argued for a high-powered committee to visit Manipur and record statements of the survivors. She added the SC could decide the future course of action based on that report.

Jaising told Supreme Court that as per the Centre’s status report, 595 FIRs have been registered. How many of these relate to sexual violence, and how many are arson, murder, there is no clarity, Jaising added.

Attorney-General R. Venkataramani then said there were “too many complications”, both political and non-political, and proposed a CBI probe.

Meanwhile, CJI DY Chandrachud observed that the video pertaining to these three women is not the only incident. He said that what happened to the women was not an isolated incident and called for a broader mechanism to take care of violence against women in the north-eastern state.

He then asked the Attorney General how many FIRs have been registered so far pertaining to violence against women.

The two women filed petitions in the Supreme Court against the center and the Manipur government. The petitions request that the Supreme Court take suo motu action on the case and order a fair and impartial inquiry.

The victims have also requested that their identities be protected.

The two women have been referred to as “X” and “Y” in the court documents.

They have sought a probe led by an independent SIT headed by an IG-rank police officer and the transfer of the trial outside the state.

Stating that they have no faith in the state police, they have also sought security for themselves and a direction for the recording of their statement under Section 164 of the CrPC by the nearest area magistrate. This comes at a time when the center has already transferred the case to the CBI.

The Supreme Court, meanwhile, has posted the matter to be heard at 2 pm tomorrow.

Also Read: Manipur unrest: Supreme Court to hear pleas of Centre and victims of May 4 sexual assault today

COMMENTS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment *

Name *

Email *

Website