Northeast India’s Only English and Hindi Satellite News Channel

US: Judge blocks Trump’s executive order stopping birthright citizenship, calls it ‘blatantly unconstitutional’

First Published: 24th January, 2025 7:57 IST

He warned that children who are denied citizenship under Trump's executive order would face "long-term substantial negative impacts."

A federal judge ruled Thursday that President Donald Trump‘s executive order to end birthright citizenship is “blatantly unconstitutional” and issued a temporary restraining order to block the policy from taking effect, CNN reported.

Judge John Coughenour, a Ronald Reagan appointee based in Seattle, granted an emergency request from Washington State Attorney General Nick Brown and three other Democratic-led states to halt the executive order for the next 14 days while the legal challenge continues.

“I have been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case whether the question presented was as clear,” Coughenour said.

“Where were the lawyers” when the decision to sign the executive order was made, the judge asked. He said that it “boggled” his mind that a member of the bar would claim the order was constitutional.
Notably, the Democratic-led states are seeking a temporary restraining order, as they argue that Trump’s executive order is a blatant violation of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all children born on US soil and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, as reported by CNN.

Lane Polozola, an attorney representing the state of Washington, told the judge that “births cannot be paused” while the court reviews the case.
“Babies are being born today here, and in the plaintiff states and around the country, with a cloud cast over their citizenship,” Polozola said.

He warned that children who are denied citizenship under Trump’s executive order would face “long-term substantial negative impacts.”

Polozola further argued that the Trump administration had not only ignored these potential harms in its filings but that the harm “appears to be the purpose” of the order itself.
In addition to the impact on individuals, Washington and other states argue that ending birthright citizenship would place a financial and logistical burden on state programs, as these children would no longer be eligible for federal benefits that they would typically receive as US citizens, as reported by CNN.
In defence, the Trump administration argues that the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” allows the president to exclude children of undocumented immigrants, as well as children of parents who are legally present but lack permanent status.

Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate urged the judge to hold off on issuing an emergency order blocking the policy until there was more briefing on the policy.
“I understand your concerns,” Shumate said, but he urged the court against making “a snap judgment on the merits.”

Shumate noted that the other cases challenging the executive order were moving on a slower timeline and argued that “imminent harm” was threatening the states. (ANI)

COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

WE RECOMMEND

Banner
Taiwanese researchers uncover new cancer signalling mechanism

Together, these mechanisms create a self-sustaining cycle that accelerates cancer progression, the report said.

10th February 2025
Banner
Trump rules out deporting Prince Harry: “He’s got enough problems with his wife”

"I don't want to do that," he said. "I'll leave him alone. He's got enough problems with his wife. She's terrible," Trump added while speaking with the New York Post.

09th February 2025
Banner
Alaska Passenger Plane with 10 Onboard Goes Missing, Search Underway

However, search and rescue operations are being hindered by poor visibility and severe weather conditions in the region.

07th February 2025
Banner
Longest Prison Sentence Ever? Here’s Why This Man Gets 475 Years Sentence

Burrell's defense attorney, David Heath, has already moved for a new trial, arguing the verdict was "contrary to evidence"

05th February 2025
Banner
Nepal Bans Solo Expedition To Mount Everest And Mountains Above 8000 Metres

The new provisions would come into effect from 1st of September this year with the start in the spring expedition.

05th February 2025