Is Uploading Your Photo to AI Image Generators Including Ghibli-Style a Privacy Risk? Here’s How to Keep Your Biometric Data Safe

Ghibli-Style Image ChatGPT: As AI trends continue to grow, it is essential to stay alert about the potential risks.

Ever since OpenAI launched ChatGPT’s Ghibli-style AI image generator last week, social media has been buzzing with a whirlwind of enchanting, anime-inspired portraits. From politicians and celebrities to everyday users, everyone seems to be captivated by the signature style of Ghibli legend Hayao Miyazaki. The latest update allows users to transform their photos or even popular internet memes into stunning Ghibli-style art, and the trend has taken off like wildfire.

However, amidst the excitement and artistic flair, a controversy has emerged that digs deeper than just aesthetics. Concerns are mounting over data privacy, ethical implications, and the potential misuse of AI-generated images.

Adding to the buzz, Elon Musk’s AI chatbot, Grok, has introduced a similar feature. Integrated into Grok 3, this Ghibli-style image generation capability offers users the chance to create charming Ghibli-inspired images for free. The appeal of turning everyday snapshots into whimsical animations is undeniable, but the feature’s rapid rise has triggered a wave of caution among digital privacy advocates.

While the trend has undoubtedly brought a surge of creativity to social media, it has also sparked a critical dialogue on privacy. Digital privacy activists on X are warning users that OpenAI’s sudden surge in personal image uploads might not be as harmless as it seems. The crux of the concern lies in how these images might be used to train AI models, possibly without explicit user consent.

As AI trends continue to grow, it is essential to stay alert about the potential risks.

Here are some steps to protect your biometric data:  

• Think twice before uploading personal photos for AI-generated images.
• Avoid sharing high-resolution images on social media—they can be scraped for AI training.
• Use PINs or passwords instead of facial recognition to unlock devices.
• Limit camera access by checking which apps have permission to use it.

Analysts claim that OpenAI might be leveraging the trend to amass a vast database of personal images for training its AI algorithms. As people willingly upload their photos to be transformed, they may unknowingly be giving OpenAI free access to their biometric data.

The ethical implications go beyond privacy. The debate also touches on how AI tools are trained using copyrighted creative works. Hayao Miyazaki, 84, renowned for his hand-drawn animation style and whimsical storytelling, has expressed his scepticism regarding AI’s role in art. For many artists, the idea that their creative essence could be replicated by algorithms is troubling.

The issue becomes even more complicated when considering data protection laws. Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), OpenAI must justify data collection under the principle of “legitimate interest.” This means that the company must demonstrate that collecting and processing images are necessary and do not infringe on individuals’ rights. Additionally, strict transparency and accountability measures are required.

However, legal experts like Luiza Jarovsky, co-founder of the AI, Tech & Privacy Academy, suggest that OpenAI’s approach could be more strategic. She points out that when users voluntarily upload images, they essentially give their consent under GDPR’s Article 6.1.a, which grants OpenAI more flexibility. The critical difference is that this voluntary submission bypasses the need for the “legitimate interest” argument.

Jarovsky highlights how OpenAI’s privacy policy clearly states that personal data input by users can be collected to train its AI models unless users opt out. This approach allows OpenAI to gain easy access to fresh biometric data, while third parties and competitors are left only with the “Ghiblified” images, not the original photos.

In this context, the trend is more than just a legal grey area—it reflects a gap in public awareness about how personal data can be used. Many users are unaware that by sharing a seemingly harmless animated version of their face, they might be inadvertently handing over their likeness for future AI training.

Meanwhile, Grok’s stance on image retention is equally ambiguous. When asked whether it is safe to upload personal photos to generate Ghibli-style images, Grok’s response was cautiously vague. It stated that while there is no concrete confirmation from xAI regarding data retention, users should be aware of the broader AI landscape. Other companies often store uploaded data on servers, which could be prone to breaches.

Grok’s reply highlighted that once a photo is processed, it is theoretically possible for the AI to replicate the likeness in other contexts, even if there is no evidence of intentional misuse. The uncertainty surrounding data retention and the potential for data leaks means that users need to be extra cautious.

Interestingly, OpenAI itself has not released a formal statement addressing the safety of using personal photos in the Ghibli-style AI image generator. When prompted directly via ChatGPT, the response emphasised caution, advising users not to upload sensitive images unless they were confident in the tool’s privacy measures. The reply noted that OpenAI does not retain or use images beyond the session unless users permit data usage.

Beyond the immediate concern of personal data security, the rise of Ghibli-style AI image generators also raises deeper questions about the commodification of biometric data. In an era where data is one of the most valuable assets, trends like these inadvertently contribute to a growing pool of information that tech companies can harness for profit and innovation.

While the Ghibli-style AI image trend brings a delightful artistic twist to social media, it also serves as a timely reminder of the privacy risks inherent in emerging technologies. Whether using ChatGPT’s version or Grok’s tool, users must balance the desire for creative expression with the imperative to safeguard personal data. As debates around AI ethics and privacy continue, being informed and cautious remains crucial in the digital age.

Also Read: Not Able to Create Ghibli-Style Images on ChatGPT? Here’s an Alternative

COMMENTS